Wood v. Allen
| Wood v. Allen | |
|---|---|
![]() | |
| Decided January 20, 2010 | |
| Full case name | Wood v. Allen |
| Citations | 558 U.S. 290 (more) |
| Holding | |
| The state court’s conclusion that the petitioner's counsel made a strategic decision not to pursue or present evidence of his mental deficiencies was not an unreasonable determination of the facts. Habeas petition denied. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Sotomayor |
| Dissent | Stevens, joined by Kennedy |
Wood v. Allen, 558 U.S. 290 (2010), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the state court's conclusion that the petitioner's counsel made a strategic decision not to pursue or present evidence of his mental deficiencies was not an unreasonable determination of the facts. The Court therefore denied the habeas corpus petition.[1] Having thus disposed of the claim, the Court declined to decide the issues the petition raised about interpreting the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act.[2]
References
External links
This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain.
