Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican Party
| Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican Party | |
|---|---|
![]() | |
| Decided March 18, 2008 | |
| Full case name | Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican Party |
| Citations | 552 U.S. 442 (more) |
| Holding | |
| Washington's top-two primary system does not infringe upon smaller political parties' associational rights. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Thomas, joined by Roberts, Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito |
| Concurrence | Roberts, joined by Alito |
| Dissent | Scalia, joined by Kennedy |
Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican Party, 552 U.S. 442 (2008), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that Washington's top-two primary system does not infringe upon smaller political parties' associational rights.[1][2]
