Teamsters v. Lucas Flour Co.
| Teamsters v. Lucas Flour Co. | |
|---|---|
![]() | |
| Decided March 5, 1962 | |
| Full case name | Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America v. Lucas Flour Co. |
| Citations | 369 U.S. 95 (more) |
| Holding | |
| A binding arbitration stipulation in a collective bargaining agreement constitutes a limited, implied no-strike clause over the matters subject to arbitration. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Stewart |
| Dissent | Black |
Teamsters v. Lucas Flour Co., 369 U.S. 95 (1962), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that a binding arbitration stipulation in a collective bargaining agreement constitutes a limited, implied no-strike clause over the matters subject to arbitration. Therefore, a strike to settle a dispute subject to mandatory arbitration was unprotected.[1][2][3]
Significance
Technically, this case was limited to an award of monetary damages to the employer for an unprotected strike. A later case, Gateway Coal Co. v. Mine Workers, extended this principle to injunctive relief.[3]
References
External links
This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain.
