Soto v. United States
| Soto v. United States | |
|---|---|
![]() | |
| Decided June 12, 2025 | |
| Full case name | Soto v. United States |
| Docket no. | 24-320 |
| Citations | 605 U.S. ___ (more) |
| Holding | |
| The CRSC statute confers authority to settle CRSC claims and thus displaces the Barring Act's settlement procedures and limitations period. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinion | |
| Majority | Thomas, joined by unanimous |
| Laws applied | |
| 31 U.S.C. § 370, 10 U.S.C. § 1413a | |
Soto v. United States, 605 U.S. ___ (2025), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that the combat-related special compensation (CRSC) statute, 10 U.S.C. § 1413a, confers authority to settle CRSC claims and thus displaces the Barring Act's settlement procedures and limitations period.[1][2]
References
External links
This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain.
