San Antonio v. Hotels.com, L. P.

San Antonio v. Hotels.com, L. P.
Decided May 27, 2021
Full case nameSan Antonio v. Hotels.com, L. P.
Docket no.20-334
Citations593 U.S. ___ (more)
Holding
Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 39 does not permit a district court to alter a court of appeals’ allocation of the costs listed in subdivision (e) of that rule.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Clarence Thomas · Stephen Breyer
Samuel Alito · Sonia Sotomayor
Elena Kagan · Neil Gorsuch
Brett Kavanaugh · Amy Coney Barrett
Case opinion
MajorityAlito, joined by unanimous
Laws applied
Fed. R. App. P. 39

San Antonio v. Hotels.com, L. P., 593 U.S. ___ (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 39 does not permit a district court to alter a court of appeals’ allocation of the costs listed in subsection (e) of that rule.[1] Rule 39 is about awarding the costs of the appeal to the victor, and subsection (e) is about the taxation of such an award.[2]

References

  1. ^ San Antonio v. Hotels.com, L. P., No. 20-334, 593 U.S. ___ (2021)
  2. ^ "Unanimous court rejects district court discretion to reduce appellate cost awards". SCOTUSblog. May 28, 2021. Retrieved October 24, 2024.
  • Text of San Antonio v. Hotels.com, L. P., No. 20-334, 593 U.S. ___ (2021) is available from: Justia

This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain.