Roman Catholic Archdiocese of San Juan, Puerto Rico v. Feliciano

Roman Catholic Archdiocese of San Juan, Puerto Rico v. Feliciano
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 24, 2020
Full case nameRoman Catholic Archdiocese of San Juan, Puerto Rico v. Feliciano
Docket no.18-921
Citations589 U.S. ___ (more)
Holding
A Puerto Rico trial court has no jurisdiction to issue payment and seizure orders after a pension benefits proceeding is removed to federal district court and before the proceeding is remanded back to the Puerto Rico court.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Clarence Thomas · Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer · Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor · Elena Kagan
Neil Gorsuch · Brett Kavanaugh
Case opinion
Per curiam

Roman Catholic Archdiocese of San Juan, Puerto Rico v. Feliciano, 589 U.S. ___ (2020), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a Puerto Rico trial court has no jurisdiction to issue payment and seizure orders after a pension benefits proceeding is removed to federal district court and before the proceeding is remanded back to the Puerto Rico court.[1][2][3]

References

  1. ^ Roman Catholic Archdiocese of San Juan, Puerto Rico v. Feliciano, No. 18-921, 589 U.S. ___ (2020).
  2. ^ "Justices to take up case involving faith-based adoption agencies and same-sex couples". SCOTUSblog. February 24, 2020. Retrieved November 5, 2024.
  3. ^ "Did the Supreme Court Really Ban Nunc Pro Tunc Orders?". www.burr.com. March 6, 2020. Retrieved November 5, 2024.
  • Text of Roman Catholic Archdiocese of San Juan, Puerto Rico v. Feliciano, No. 18-921, 589 U.S. ___ (2020) is available from: Justia
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is available under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 unless otherwise noted. Additional terms may apply for the media files.