Ortiz v. Jordan

Ortiz v. Jordan
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 24, 2011
Full case nameOrtiz v. Jordan
Citations562 U.S. 180 (more)
Holding
A party may not appeal a denial of summary judgment after a district court has conducted a full trial on the merits.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy
Clarence Thomas · Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer · Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor · Elena Kagan
Case opinion
MajorityGinsburg, joined by unanimous
Laws applied
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

Ortiz v. Jordan, 562 U.S. 180 (2011), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a party may not appeal a denial of summary judgment after a district court has conducted a full trial on the merits.[1][2]

See also

References

  1. ^ Ortiz v. Jordan, 562 U.S. 180 (2011).
  2. ^ "Last week's opinions: In Plain English". SCOTUSblog. January 31, 2011. Retrieved November 14, 2024.

This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain.

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is available under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 unless otherwise noted. Additional terms may apply for the media files.