Loughrin v. United States
| Loughrin v. United States | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Decided June 23, 2014 | |
| Full case name | Loughrin v. United States |
| Citations | 573 U.S. 351 (more) |
| Holding | |
| A conviction of the crime of knowingly executing a scheme to obtain property owned by, or under the custody of, a bank "by means of false or fraudulent pretenses," does not require the government to prove that a defendant intended to defraud a financial institution. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Kagan, joined by unanimous |
| Concur/dissent | Scalia, joined by Thomas |
| Laws applied | |
Loughrin v. United States, 573 U.S. 351 (2014), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a conviction of the crime of knowingly executing a scheme to obtain property owned by, or under the custody of, a bank "by means of false or fraudulent pretenses," does not require the government to prove that a defendant intended to defraud a financial institution.[1][2]