Kármán–Moore theory is a linearized theory for supersonic flows over a slender body, named after Theodore von Kármán and Norton B. Moore, who developed the theory in 1932.[1][2] The theory, in particular, provides an explicit formula for the wave drag, which converts the kinetic energy of the moving body into outgoing sound waves behind the body.[3]
Mathematical description
Consider a slender body with pointed edges at the front and back. The supersonic flow past this body will be nearly parallel to the  -axis everywhere since the shock waves formed (one at the leading edge and one at the trailing edge) will be weak; as a consequence, the flow will be potential everywhere, which can be described using the velocity potential
-axis everywhere since the shock waves formed (one at the leading edge and one at the trailing edge) will be weak; as a consequence, the flow will be potential everywhere, which can be described using the velocity potential  , where
, where  is the incoming uniform velocity and
 is the incoming uniform velocity and  characterising the small deviation from the uniform flow. In the linearized theory,
 characterising the small deviation from the uniform flow. In the linearized theory,  satisfies
 satisfies
 
where  ,
,  is the sound speed in the incoming flow and
 is the sound speed in the incoming flow and  is the Mach number of the incoming flow. This is just the two-dimensional wave equation and
 is the Mach number of the incoming flow. This is just the two-dimensional wave equation and  is a disturbance propagated with an apparent time
 is a disturbance propagated with an apparent time  and with an apparent velocity
 and with an apparent velocity  .
.
Let the origin  be located at the leading end of the pointed body. Further, let
 be located at the leading end of the pointed body. Further, let  be the cross-sectional area (perpendicular to the
 be the cross-sectional area (perpendicular to the  -axis) and
-axis) and  be the length of the slender body, so that
 be the length of the slender body, so that  for
 for  and for
 and for  . Of course, in supersonic flows, disturbances (i.e.,
. Of course, in supersonic flows, disturbances (i.e.,  ) can be propagated only into the region behind the Mach cone. The weak Mach cone for the leading-edge is given by
) can be propagated only into the region behind the Mach cone. The weak Mach cone for the leading-edge is given by  , whereas the weak Mach cone for the trailing edge is given by
, whereas the weak Mach cone for the trailing edge is given by  , where
, where  is the squared radial distance from the
 is the squared radial distance from the  -axis.
-axis. 
The disturbance far away from the body is just like a cylindrical wave propagation. In front of the cone  , the solution is simply given by
, the solution is simply given by  . Between the cones
. Between the cones  and
 and  , the solution is given by[3]
, the solution is given by[3]
 
whereas the behind the cone  , the solution is given by
, the solution is given by
 
The solution described above is exact for all  when the slender body is a solid of revolution. If this is not the case, the solution is valid at large distances will have correction associated with the non-linear distortion of the shock profile, whose strength is proportional to
 when the slender body is a solid of revolution. If this is not the case, the solution is valid at large distances will have correction associated with the non-linear distortion of the shock profile, whose strength is proportional to  and a factor depending on the shape function
 and a factor depending on the shape function  .[4]
.[4]
The drag force  is just the
 is just the  -component of the momentum per unit time. To calculate this, consider a cylindrical surface with a large radius and with an axis along the
-component of the momentum per unit time. To calculate this, consider a cylindrical surface with a large radius and with an axis along the  -axis. The momentum flux density crossing through this surface is simply given by
-axis. The momentum flux density crossing through this surface is simply given by  . Integrating
. Integrating  over the cylindrical surface gives the drag force. Due to symmetry, the first term in
 over the cylindrical surface gives the drag force. Due to symmetry, the first term in  upon integration gives zero since the net mass flux
 upon integration gives zero since the net mass flux  is zero on the cylindrical surface considered. The second term gives the non-zero contribution,
 is zero on the cylindrical surface considered. The second term gives the non-zero contribution,
 
At large distances, the values  (the wave region) are the most important in the solution for
 (the wave region) are the most important in the solution for  ; this is because, as mentioned earlier,
; this is because, as mentioned earlier,  is a like disturbance propating with a speed
 is a like disturbance propating with a speed  with an apparent time
  with an apparent time  . This means that we can approximate the expression in the denominator as
. This means that we can approximate the expression in the denominator as  Then we can write, for example,
 Then we can write, for example,
 
From this expression, we can calculate  , which is also equal to
, which is also equal to  since we are in the wave region. The factor
 since we are in the wave region. The factor  appearing in front of the integral need not to be differentiated since this gives rise to the small correction proportional to
 appearing in front of the integral need not to be differentiated since this gives rise to the small correction proportional to  . Effecting the differentiation and returning to the original variables, we find
. Effecting the differentiation and returning to the original variables, we find
 
Substituting this in the drag force formula gives us
 
This can be simplified by carrying out the integration over  . When the integration order is changed, the limit for
. When the integration order is changed, the limit for  ranges from the
 ranges from the  to
 to  . Upon integration, we have
. Upon integration, we have
![{\displaystyle F=-{\frac {\rho _{1}v_{1}^{2}}{2\pi }}\int _{0}^{l}\int _{0}^{\xi _{2}}S''(\xi _{1})S''(\xi _{2})[\ln(\xi _{2}-\xi _{1})-\ln 4L]d\xi _{1}d\xi _{2}.}](./_assets_/b31af696bec732f9e72fe877ae9f124a86418155.svg) 
The integral containing the term  is zero because
 is zero because  (of course, in addition to
 (of course, in addition to  ).
).
The final formula for the wave drag force may be written as 
 
or
 
The drag coefficient is then given by
 
Since  that follows from the formula derived above,
 that follows from the formula derived above,  , indicating that the drag coefficient is proportional to the square of the cross-sectional area and inversely proportional to the fourth power of the body length.
, indicating that the drag coefficient is proportional to the square of the cross-sectional area and inversely proportional to the fourth power of the body length.
The shape with smallest wave drag for a given volume  and length
 and length  can be obtained from the wave drag force formula. This shape is known as the Sears–Haack body.[5][6]
 can be obtained from the wave drag force formula. This shape is known as the Sears–Haack body.[5][6]
See also
References
- ^ Von Karman, T., & Moore, N. B. (1932). Resistance of slender bodies moving with supersonic velocities, with special reference to projectiles. Transactions of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 54(2), 303-310.
- ^ Ward, G. N. (1949). Supersonic flow past slender pointed bodies. The Quarterly Journal of Mechanics and Applied Mathematics, 2(1), 75-97.
- ^ a b Landau, L. D., & Lifshitz, E. M. (2013). Fluid mechanics: Landau And Lifshitz: course of theoretical physics, Volume 6 (Vol. 6). Elsevier. section 123. pages 123-124
- ^ Whitham, G. B. (2011). Linear and nonlinear waves. John Wiley & Sons. pages 335-336.
- ^ Haack, W. (1941). Geschossformen kleinsten wellenwiderstandes. Bericht der Lilienthal-Gesellschaft, 136(1), 14-28.
- ^ Sears, W. R. (1947). On projectiles of minimum wave drag. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, 4(4), 361-366.