The purpose of this page is to catalog new, interesting, and useful identities related to number-theoretic divisor sums, i.e., sums of an arithmetic function over the divisors of a natural number  , or equivalently the Dirichlet convolution of an arithmetic function
, or equivalently the Dirichlet convolution of an arithmetic function  with one:
 with one:
 
These identities include applications to sums of an arithmetic function over just the proper prime divisors of  . 
We also define periodic variants of these divisor sums with respect to the greatest common divisor function in the form of
. 
We also define periodic variants of these divisor sums with respect to the greatest common divisor function in the form of
 
Well-known inversion relations that allow the function  to be expressed in terms of
 to be expressed in terms of  are provided by the Möbius inversion formula. 
Naturally, some of the most interesting examples of such identities result when considering the average order summatory functions over an arithmetic function
 are provided by the Möbius inversion formula. 
Naturally, some of the most interesting examples of such identities result when considering the average order summatory functions over an arithmetic function  defined as a divisor sum of another arithmetic function
 defined as a divisor sum of another arithmetic function  . Particular examples of divisor sums involving special arithmetic functions and special Dirichlet convolutions of arithmetic functions can be found on the following pages: 
here, here, here, here, and here.
. Particular examples of divisor sums involving special arithmetic functions and special Dirichlet convolutions of arithmetic functions can be found on the following pages: 
here, here, here, here, and here.
Average order sum identities
Interchange of summation identities
The following identities are the primary motivation for creating this topics page. These identities do not appear to be well-known, or at least well-documented, and are extremely useful tools to have at hand in some applications. In what follows, we consider that  are any prescribed arithmetic functions and that
 are any prescribed arithmetic functions and that  denotes the summatory function of
 denotes the summatory function of  . A more common special case of the first summation below is referenced here.[1]
. A more common special case of the first summation below is referenced here.[1]
 
 
 
 
 
In general, these identities are collected from the so-called "rarities and b-sides" of both well established and semi-obscure analytic number theory notes and techniques and the papers and work of the contributors. The identities themselves are not difficult to prove and are an exercise in standard manipulations of series inversion and divisor sums. Therefore, we omit their proofs here.
The convolution method
The convolution method is a general technique for estimating average order sums of the form
 
where the multiplicative function f can be written as a convolution of the form  for suitable, application-defined arithmetic functions g and h. A short survey of this method can be found here.
 for suitable, application-defined arithmetic functions g and h. A short survey of this method can be found here.
A related technique is the use of the formula
 
this is known as the Dirichlet hyperbola method.
Periodic divisor sums
An arithmetic function is periodic (mod k), or k-periodic, if  for all
 for all  . Particular examples of k-periodic number theoretic functions are the Dirichlet characters
. Particular examples of k-periodic number theoretic functions are the Dirichlet characters  modulo k and the greatest common divisor function
 modulo k and the greatest common divisor function  . It is known that every k-periodic arithmetic function has a representation as a finite discrete Fourier series of the form
. It is known that every k-periodic arithmetic function has a representation as a finite discrete Fourier series of the form
 
where the Fourier coefficients  defined by the following equation are also k-periodic:
 defined by the following equation are also k-periodic:
 
We are interested in the following k-periodic divisor sums:
 
It is a fact that the Fourier coefficients of these divisor sum variants are given by the formula [2]
 
We can also express the Fourier coefficients in the equation immediately above in terms of the Fourier transform of any function h at the input of  using the following result where
 using the following result where  is a Ramanujan sum (cf. Fourier transform of the totient function):[3]
 is a Ramanujan sum (cf. Fourier transform of the totient function):[3]
 
Thus by combining the results above we obtain that
 
Sums over prime divisors
Let the function  denote the characteristic function of the primes, i.e.,
 denote the characteristic function of the primes, i.e.,  if and only if
 if and only if  is prime and is zero-valued otherwise. Then as a special case of the first identity in equation (1) in section interchange of summation identities above, we can express the average order sums
 is prime and is zero-valued otherwise. Then as a special case of the first identity in equation (1) in section interchange of summation identities above, we can express the average order sums
 
We also have an integral formula based on Abel summation for sums of the form [4]
 
where  denotes the prime-counting function. Here we typically make the assumption that the function f is continuous and differentiable.
 denotes the prime-counting function. Here we typically make the assumption that the function f is continuous and differentiable.
Some lesser appreciated divisor sum identities
We have the following divisor sum formulas for f any arithmetic function and g completely multiplicative where  is Euler's totient function and
 is Euler's totient function and  is the Möbius function:[5][6]
 is the Möbius function:[5][6]
 
 
 
- If f is completely multiplicative then the pointwise multiplication  with a Dirichlet convolution yields with a Dirichlet convolution yields . .
 
- If  and n has more than m distinct prime factors, then and n has more than m distinct prime factors, then 
The Dirichlet inverse of an arithmetic function
We adopt the notation that  denotes the multiplicative identity of Dirichlet convolution so that
 denotes the multiplicative identity of Dirichlet convolution so that  for any arithmetic function f and
 for any arithmetic function f and  . The Dirichlet inverse of a function f satisfies
. The Dirichlet inverse of a function f satisfies  for all
 for all  . There is a well-known recursive convolution formula for computing the Dirichlet inverse
. There is a well-known recursive convolution formula for computing the Dirichlet inverse  of a function f by induction given in the form of [7]
 of a function f by induction given in the form of [7]
 
For a fixed function f, let the function  
Next, define the following two multiple, or nested, convolution variants for any fixed arithmetic function f:
 
The function  by the equivalent pair of summation formulas in the next equation is closely related to the Dirichlet inverse for an arbitrary function f.[8]
 by the equivalent pair of summation formulas in the next equation is closely related to the Dirichlet inverse for an arbitrary function f.[8]
 
In particular, we can prove that [9]
 
A table of the values of  for
 for  appears below. This table makes precise the intended meaning and interpretation of this function as the signed sum of all possible multiple k-convolutions of the function f with itself.
 appears below. This table makes precise the intended meaning and interpretation of this function as the signed sum of all possible multiple k-convolutions of the function f with itself.
| n |  | n |  | n |   | 
| 2 |  | 7 |  | 12 |   | 
| 3 |  | 8 |  | 13 |   | 
| 4 |  | 9 |  | 14 |   | 
| 5 |  | 10 |  | 15 |   | 
| 6 |  | 11 |  | 16 |   | 
Let  where p is the Partition function (number theory). Then there is another expression for the Dirichlet inverse given in terms of the functions above and the coefficients of the q-Pochhammer symbol for
 where p is the Partition function (number theory). Then there is another expression for the Dirichlet inverse given in terms of the functions above and the coefficients of the q-Pochhammer symbol for  given by [8]
 given by [8]
![{\displaystyle f^{-1}(n)=\sum _{k=1}^{n}\left[(p_{k}\ast \mu )(n)+(p_{k}\ast D_{f}\ast \mu )(n)\right]\times [q^{k-1}]{\frac {(q;q)_{\infty }}{1-q}}.}](./_assets_/d2dbc555dcc3cab82c5f673c063354281ea11b10.svg) 
Variants of sums over arithmetic functions
See also
Notes
- ^ See also Section 3.10 of Apostol.
- ^ Section 27.10 in the NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions (DLMF).
- ^ Schramm, W. (2008). "The Fourier transform of functions of the greatest common divisors". Integers. 8.
- ^ See Section 2.2 in Villarino, M. B. (2005). "Mertens' Proof of Mertens' Theorem". arXiv:math/0504289.
- ^ In respective order from Apostol's book: Exercise 2.29, Theorem 2.18, and Exercises 2.31-2.32
- ^ The first identity has a well-known Dirichlet series of the form  catalogued in Gould, Henry W.; Shonhiwa, Temba (2008). "A catalogue of interesting Dirichlet series". Miss. J. Math. Sci. 20 (1). Archived from the original on 2011-10-02. catalogued in Gould, Henry W.; Shonhiwa, Temba (2008). "A catalogue of interesting Dirichlet series". Miss. J. Math. Sci. 20 (1). Archived from the original on 2011-10-02.
- ^ See Section 2.7 of Apostol's book for a proof.
- ^ a b M. Merca and M. D. Schmidt (2017). "Factorization Theorems for Generalized Lambert Series and Applications". pp. 13–20. arXiv:1712.00611 [math.NT].
- ^ This identity is proved in an unpublished manuscript by M. D. Schmidt which will appear on ArXiv in 2018.
 
References