CNH Industrial N.V. v. Reese
| CNH Industrial N.V. v. Reese | |
|---|---|
![]() | |
| Decided February 20, 2018 | |
| Full case name | CNH Industrial N.V. v. Reese |
| Docket no. | 17-515 |
| Citations | 583 U.S. ___ (more) |
| Holding | |
| When a collective bargaining agreement contains a durational clause, the clause cannot be found to be ambiguous based only on a presumption that such agreements provide lifetime vesting of healthcare benefits for retirees. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinion | |
| Per curiam | |
CNH Industrial N.V. v. Reese, 583 U.S. ___ (2018), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that when a collective bargaining agreement contains a durational clause, the clause cannot be found to be ambiguous based only on a presumption that such agreements provide lifetime vesting of healthcare benefits for retirees.[1][2]
References
External links
This article incorporates written opinion of a United States federal court. As a work of the U.S. federal government, the text is in the public domain.
