B&B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Industries, Inc.
| B&B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Industries, Inc. | |
|---|---|
![]() | |
| Decided December 2, 2014 | |
| Full case name | B&B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Industries, Inc. |
| Citations | 575 U.S. 138 (more) |
| Holding | |
| Trademark Trial and Appeal Board adjudications of trademark infringement can preclude issues for district courts. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Alito |
| Concurrence | Ginsburg |
| Dissent | Thomas, joined by Scalia |
B&B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Industries, Inc., 575 U.S. 138 (2014), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that Trademark Trial and Appeal Board adjudications of trademark infringement can preclude issues for district courts.[1][2][3]
References
- ^ B&B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Industries, Inc., 575 U.S. 138 (2014).
- ^ Janis, Mark D. (2017). Trademark and Unfair Competition in a Nutshell (2nd ed.). West Academic. p. 228.
- ^ "Opinion analysis: Justices unsettled in trademark preclusion dispute". SCOTUSblog. March 25, 2015. Retrieved December 12, 2024.
