Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. v. Republic of Cuba
| Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. v. Republic of Cuba | |
|---|---|
![]() | |
| Decided May 24, 1976 | |
| Full case name | Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. v. Republic of Cuba |
| Citations | 425 U.S. 682 (more) |
| Holding | |
| The Act of State doctrine does not apply to foreign acts that are "purely commercial." | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | White, joined by Burger, Powell, Rehnquist, Stevens |
| Concurrence | Powell |
| Concurrence | Stevens |
| Dissent | Marshall, joined by Brennan, Stewart, Blackmun |
Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. v. Republic of Cuba, 425 U.S. 682 (1976), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Act of State doctrine does not apply to foreign acts that are "purely commercial."[1][2]
